• 12/22/2017
    21655.8
    Dismissed
  • 12/21/2017
    21461(A)
    Dismissed
  • 12/21/2017
    38300
    0 Point Plea
  • 12/19/2017
    21453(A)
    Dismissed
  • 12/19/2017
    21453(A)
    Dismissed
  • 12/18/2017
    22349(A)
    Dismissed
  • 12/18/2017
    14601.1(A)
    Dismissed
  • 12/18/2017
    26708.1(A)
    Dismissed
  • 12/18/2017
    4000(A)
    Dismissed
  • 12/14/2017
    22348(b)
    Dismissed
  • 12/13/2017
    22349(A)
    Dismissed
  • 12/12/2017
    22348(b)
    Dismissed
  • 12/12/2017
    21461(A)
    Dismissed
  • 12/12/2017
    22348 ( c )
    Dismissed
  • 12/12/2017
    22356(b)
    0 Point Plea
  • 12/7/2017
    22349(A)
    Dismissed
  • 12/7/2017
    21453(A)
    Dismissed
  • 12/6/2017
    22400(A)
    Traffic School
  • 12/5/2017
    22349(A)
    Traffic School
  • 12/4/2017
    23152(A)
    Dismissed
  • 12/4/2017
    23152(B)
    Dismissed
  • 11/28/2017
    22348(b)
    Dismissed
  • 11/28/2017
    22349(A)
    Dismissed
  • 11/28/2017
    22348©
    Dismissed
  • 11/27/2017
    22406(A)
    Dismissed
  • 11/27/2017
    16028(A)
    Dismissed
  • 11/27/2017
    21655.5(b)
    Dismissed
  • 11/20/2017
    22350
    Dismissed
  • 11/20/2017
    21453(A)
    Dismissed
  • 11/20/2017
    22350
    Dismissed
  • 11/17/2017
    22350
    Traffic School
  • 11/17/2017
    5200
    Dismissed
  • 11/17/2017
    22349(A)
    Traffic School
  • 11/16/2017
    22348(b)
    Dismissed
  • 11/15/2017
    16028(A)
    Dismissed
  • 11/15/2017
    22356(B)
    Dismissed
  • 11/15/2017
    38300
    0 Point Plea
  • 11/14/2017
    22349(A)
    Dismissed
  • 11/15/2017
    16028(A)
    Dismissed
  • 11/14/2017
    22349(A)
    Dismissed
  • 11/13/2017
    5200
    Dismissed
  • 11/13/2017
    16028(A)
    Dismissed
  • 11/9/2017
    35401(A)
    Dismissed
  • 11/8/2017
    22348(b)
    Guilty
  • 11/8/2017
    21658(A)
    Dismissed
  • 11/8/2017
    38300
    0 Point Plea
  • 11/8/2017
    5200
    Dismissed
  • 11/1/2017
    27315(d)
    Dismissed
  • 10/30/2017
    21655.8(A)
    Dismissed
  • 10/30/2017
    22406(B)
    Dismissed
  • 10/24/2017
    22349
    Dismissed
  • 10/24/2017
    22350
    Dismissed
  • 10/24/2017
    22101(d)
    0 Point Plea
  • 10/23/2017
    23152
    0 Point Plea
  • 10/19/2017
    21453(A)
    Dismissed
  • 10/19/2017
    38300
    0 Point Plea
  • 10/17/2017
    21453(A)
    Dismissed
  • 10/17/2017
    22350
    Dismissed
  • 10/17/2017
    38300
    0 Point Plea
  • 10/13/2017
    22349(A)
    Dismissed
  • 10/10/2017
    21453(A)
    Dismissed
  • 10/10/2017
    38300
    0 Point Plea
  • 10/6/2017
    22107
    Dismissed
  • 10/6/2017
    16028(A)
    Dismissed
  • 10/6/2017
    25269
    Nolo Contendere
  • 10/6/2017
    26708(A)(1)
    Dismissed
  • 10/6/2017
    22349(A)
    Dismissed
  • 9/28/17
    35401(a)
    Dismissed
  • 9/28/17
    35401(a)
    Dismissed
  • 9/28/17
    35401(a)
    Dismissed
  • 9/26/17
    22349(A)
    Dismissed
  • 9/19/17
    23123(A)
    Dismissed
  • 9/19/17
    22349(B)
    Not Guilty
  • 9/18/17
    22349(A)
    Traffic School
  • 9/18/17
    12500
    Dismissed
  • 9/18/17
    4000(A)
    Dismissed
  • 9/15/17
    22349(A)
    Traffic School
  • 9/14/17
    22350
    Dismissed
  • 9/13/17
    21453(A)
    Traffic School
  • 9/12/17
    21453(A)
    Dismissed
  • 9/12/17
    38300
    0 Point Plea
  • 9/8/17
    22349(A)
    Dismissed
  • 9/1/17
    16028(A)
    Dismissed
  • 9/1/17
    4000(a)(1)
    Dismissed
  • 8/31/17
    223249(a)
    Traffic School
  • 8/30/17
    21655.8(A)
    Dismissed
  • 8/30/17
    35401(A)
    Dismissed
  • 8/25/17
    22349(a)
    Dismissed
  • 8/25/17
    22349(a)
    Dismissed
  • 8/25/17
    22349(a)
    Dismissed
  • 8/24/17
    21453(a)
    Dismissed
  • 8/24/17
    38300
    0 Point Plea
  • 8/24/17
    21453(a)
    Dismissed
  • 8/23/17
    23115(A)
    Dismissed
  • 8/23/17
    34506.3
    Dismissed
  • 8/21/17
    22107
    Traffic School
  • 8/15/17
    22350
    Dismissed
  • 8/15/17
    4000(a)(1)
    Dismissed
  • 8/15/17
    22350
    Dismissed
  • 8/15/17
    4000(a)(1)
    Dismissed
  • 8/10/17
    22348(b)
    Dismissed
  • 8/9/17
    22349(a)
    Dismissed
  • 8/9/17
    22349(a)
    Dismissed
  • 8/9/17
    22348(b)
    Dismissed
  • 8/8/17
    22350
    Dismissed
  • 8/8/17
    5204(a)
    Dismissed
  • 8/8/17
    23123(A)
    Dismissed
  • 8/8/17
    22356(B)
    Dismissed
  • 8/3/17
    21461(a)
    Dismissed
  • 8/3/17
    38300
    0 Point Plea
  • 8/3/17
    27315(d)(1)
    Dismissed
  • 7/31/17
    22349(a)
    Dismissed
  • 7/31/17
    22107
    Traffic School
  • 7/31/17
    21703
    Traffic School
  • 7/26/17
    12500(A)
    Dismissed
  • 7/26/17
    4000(A)(1)
    Dismissed
  • 7/26/17
    22101(a)(1)
    Dismissed
  • 7/26/17
    38300
    0 Point Plea
  • 7/25/17
    22500(b)
    Dismissed
  • 7/21/17
    22349(a)
    Dismissed
  • 7/21/17
    4000(A)(1)
    Dismissed
  • 7/21/17
    38300
    0 Point Plea
  • 7/21/17
    22349(a)
    Traffic School
  • 7/20/17
    22348(b)
    Dismissed
  • 7/20/17
    22349(a)
    Traffic School
  • 7/19/17
    4000(A)(1)
    Dismissed
  • 7/19/17
    4000(A)(1)
    Dismissed
  • 7/19/17
    16028(a)
    Dismissed
  • 7/19/17
    22349(a)
    Dismissed
  • 7/18/17
    22349(a)
    Dismissed
  • 7/18/17
    23123(A)
    Dismissed
  • 7/18/17
    5200(A)
    Dismissed
  • 7/13/17
    23110(A)
    Dismissed
  • 7/11/17
    21453(a)
    Traffic School

Ms. Iannelli’s practice is focused primarily on traffic and related infraction and misdemeanor defense. In the last three years, Ms. Iannelli has tried over 400 cases with a 98% win ratio. Ms. Iannelli was the first to prove that the City of Laguna Woods Automated Enforcement System (Red Light Camera System) violated California law in that the City’s contract with its provider contained a “cost neutrality” clause, which the Court considered void as against public policy. In the five months following, Ms. Iannelli obtained dismissals in over 100 similar cases.

Since that time, Ms. Iannelli has been a major force in fighting against the Laguna Woods Red Light Camera System. Ms. Iannelli also represents many commercial truck drivers on a variety of violations specific to the trucking and intermodal industry. Recently, Ms. Iannelli has won acquittals against several southland cities (Irvine, Norwalk, Fountain Valley) who are attempting to enforce speed regulations by way of active speed traps. Ms. Iannelli’s extensive knowledge of the vehicle codes and the state regulations regarding traffic control devices, together with her common sense, makes her an excellent traffic defense attorney.